Politics and Security

 

 

My statement went viral that in the Reformation Era, corruption is getting more widespread, corruption is getting more widespread. That was my statement in 2017 long before I became a minister. It went viral again. People asking if Mr. Mahfud had become an official wanted to rectify this statement. Are you not ashamed of this era? now it is said that corruption is getting more widespread now more widespread in the New Order era my brother said I will not rectify it because the reality is just now today corruption is much crazier in the new era of my life I will not get any bigger in number Let's see people You have to understand this so you don't always blame the government, why don't you just stay silent? Stupid How can you let it run for so long 20 years, the blonde village Pak Jokowi has only been president for 6 years. What is the waste that has to be done, like the BLBI in 2004? It's over With the release of 2020 outside, the rules are that there are people, who have debts, who owe so much to the state, because in the past, the nation wanted to die, given the money that was recorded, suddenly someone protested that the process of issuing the SKL certificate in full is there, why is their corruption or not there is a chair to enter the court of Samsul Nur Salim, he owes it to the state, it's 4.7 to 4.8 trillion, he gives additional goods and various kinds of things, the value is only 1.1 based on the assessment of what it's called and the price has been auctioned off. Then there was The one who reported that there was corruption, from the day of production until it went to court, it was true that it was corruption, said the district court judge, that it was true that the high court judges were corrupt, but when they arrived at the Supreme Court, they were free, well, we separated again together with the same effect program. Our MD here has 1 question from Yati Nurhayati I want after there is Pak Mahfud MD in the government there will be a breakthrough, especially in law enforcement, especially the sense of fairness in its enforcement because I still remember one time Mr. Mahfud was present at the Tokyo birthday of TV One with the figures presented by TV One before he became a minister. now I am in the executive were enforcing the law I am part of the initial process and then proceed to execution but the judicial process is me Song Says Let's build justice because the law is a tool to enforce justice if the law is unfair to the law in an abstract sense, we are In making decisions, the prosecutor must also be creative, the police must also be creative. For that, it is naughty to follow the law, only in a formal sense, it can be played. You can use this article, Mr. Mahfud, if you use this article, you will be punished. Do you want to be free or not? How much do you pay if you want articles, but if you want morals it said that the law is outside the government yes the Ministry of Justice and human rights the ministry is under the president, yes but it is in the process of formulating the law-making role by the president I say the judges of the court were read under the Supreme Court in the time of Pak Harto it was somewhat restrained because of Pak Harto's era Harto's corruption was properly regulated. Judges at that time were under the Minister of Justice, so now judges are freed independently according to the law because they always play individually, what do Mahfud MD and President Joko Widodo feel when they see someone commits a hurtful act? and then by law, namely the judiciary, giving a very unfair decision. What does it feel like the president knows the feeling of the community, often discusses with the president together, they talk about this problem, often I am, how are you people being prosecuted?that's how much you have been punished, sir, it's been a trial process. I said I'm also sad. You can't interfere with your duty to present the defendant, not then determine the punishment, decide that he is a court, it seems that the government is not on site but people already know that legal experts are a matter for the judiciary in where the president can't be involved, the president often does that when there's something called, how do you call it, try to coordinate it. Have you ever discussed the Tanah Mas Mas if you know that the land problem in Indonesia is the result of thousands of land cases? Have won in court, can't be executed, many have lost too That's how it feels like, mostly In Jakarta, there were people when I had someone whose land was lost, the developer took it and reported it to the police, he was arrested and punished. Why did the police say that you have been occupying other people's land since our ancestors were here, but they already have a certificate in the name of the developer. expelled him because he was punished only robot land people Even though everyone knows he is there since his father his grandfather is useless Ombudsman is of no use I hope the laws are accelerated can be trillions of 14 trillion 10 trillion 8 trillion processed in such a way and then there for the state first while the people -the person waiting for my friend Mr. himself 180 billion he was cheated and not even a penny returned PKPU gave a decision that it would be returned within 7 years and only 30% fair is not fair but that's what courts decide. but it's not difficult to find justice in court, yes, people who feel they are being treated unfairly but this is so that we are not too pessimistic, yes, we are Alhamdulillah, we already have a court, what can it be called, who can protest, can use that it is not perfect, we are often frustrated to see that. Let's fix it slowly -Slowly, it's still a process, we've only been independent for 75 years, right? Onon, Americans have also faced things like this for decades. So if in the past there was progress, sir, there was one question, namely regarding differences between race, ethnicity and religion. When can the government be firm against radicals who hide behind religion, the government has failed. The rules are clear, firstly, radicalism appears in an intolerant attitude towards terror, we have finished it, then We are not finished, we fight it out, then the third radical attitude appears in the form of a discourse to change the system, dubbed the constitutional and ideological system, namely We have banned the organization, it shouldn't exist, what's lacking, isn't it good if it takes the form of a crime, it will continue to be followed up, meaning that now from the point of view of the rules, it's actually firm, but we want to act on it, what if people, for example, don't commit a criminal act of radicalism, if it's in the form of a discourse, we'll fight it with discourse. also through education n counseling and so on, but if it's in the form of violence because nothing is allowed, it's even said that our actions against terrorism are very, very strict, that there are no terrorists who are allowed to go out on the street. One view is not necessarily an act that actually has three actions From that radicalism, the sentence is one point of view that wants to replace this one because it doesn't fit, then his expression in his actions is takfiri, his name is blaming intolerant people, the second is that terrorists kill people and then the third. there are those that regulate deradicalization, there are those that regulate how to eradicate terrorists, there are those that regulate how to understand that everything has been regulated, but that was because we were democracies when we will act Then there are those who defend that it violates human rights and so on, we have to be careful also the police, sometimes also the military police, so if you want to act, you have to be super careful because later you will be accused of violating human rights. Mahfud MD frankly shows things that are pessimistic but feel the optimism how much regeneration to improve this one generation 5 years 10 years 15 years how long do we need to do this in three more elections already 15 years later twelve years hopefully the new generations behind us seem good- it's good that millennials just have their doors opened to govern this country what they want to see when you retire when you retire 5 years 10 years 15 years 20 years from now what is the dream of a Mahfud MD seeing the legal situation in Indonesia political recruitment which is more open is more democratic because in fact the current politics is still a lot transactional n yes, who is close, anyone can benefit What is it that can sometimes appear as a leader, hopefully in the future this will decrease when I quit my position, hopefully it will have decreased so that the next generation is like a harder wave for brings us not to see Mr. Mahfud will stop and when will my boss be a question 2024 I don't know 2024 I always say I definitely have aspirations to improve Yes of course it will improve but you don't have to work alone can also share my thoughts, write or write written in a biography Biography title that flows, I just flow, just doing well now 2024 Who wants to appear, we support, we support each other dear, yes, I have never left, I was invited to do that, but I never planned Wa I wanted to appear like this or not This is a lot of potential and is still young and good.